16Oct2012
Author
Chad Mosher
Category
Cable, Canada, Foreign, Match Game, Opinion, Review
Review: “Match Game” Canada Not a Home Run, Not a Strikeout Thumbnail

Review: “Match Game” Canada Not a Home Run, Not a Strikeout

Last night, Canada’s brand new Match Game revival premiered on the Comedy Network. Featuring such stars as Colin Mochrie, Yvette Nicole Brown and regular panelists Sean Cullen and Debra DiGiovanni, the show mixes the old spirit of the American series with the Quebec-based modern Atomes Crochus, an adaptation on the format for a French speaking audience. I watched the first episode and had a chance to review it. Let’s talk about how the show works and what I thought of it.

For some background, here’s how the game is played. The show is based on the French-Canadian Match Game adaption Atomes Crochus, which in turn is based heavily on the 1990 version of Match Game. There are two “classic” rounds, where each contestant picks a letter assigned to a question. They earn 50 points for each match and they can match up to all six people on the panel each question. After this, each player picks a panelist to play the 45 second Match-Up round. A contestant is given a blank phrase with two options to fill in that blank. The contestant selects his answer privately via computer and then the celebrity gives their pick. Each match is worth 50 points and the person in the lead at the end of this round gets their points converted into dollars and wins the game.

The winner then plays the Super Match just like most versions of the program, getting help from three panelists and then picking his own response. The most popular answer is worth $2,000, the second is worth $1,500 and the third is worth $1,000. However, the contestant doesn’t win this money in this portion of the game, it is placed as the base value for the Head-to-Head Match. The contestant then spins the arrow on the Star Wheel, stylized and adorned with “double” spaces just like Match Game 1990, which will decide how much the contestant plays for and who he plays with. If the contestant successfully matches his partner, he walks away with a few grand. However, no match likely means just winning around a few hundred dollars.

For the most part, aesthetically everything is pretty pleasing. This series is taped on the Atomes Crochus set in Quebec, which is definitely a modern take on the show. Everything is pretty tech-heavy, including the whole portion of the panel lighting up for a celebrity “locking in” their answer and the Super Match taking place on a plasma monitor in the middle of the stage. The show uses a remake/remix of the famous 1970s theme song and that sounds pretty good, combining familiarity but fitting the feel of the set. The question writing is good, eliciting suggestive but not downright filthy responses from the panel, a concern for this kind of show based in our “say whatever” era in 2012. The host, Darrin Rose, is no Gene Rayburn. Not even a Ross Shafer, but he’s passable. He had a couple of missteps, but so did Rayburn even when he was running the ship for many years. It just comes with corralling a frenetic environment like this.

My next comment isn’t really a negative or a positive, just kind of “there.” The panel really doesn’t seem to have a major chemistry. This is understandable because there is a mishmash of people getting together for the first time in many cases, but some of the party atmosphere doesn’t come off as well as the older versions do. I think if it comes back for a season two, this will grow and will feel more authentic. This comment, however, is certainly negative.Match Game does aaaaaabsolutely nothing to shed the “Canada is cheap” game show stereotype. The first winner on the show won $350 Canadian in the maingame (roughly worth the same in the U.S.) and, because he didn’t win the Head-to-Head Match, that’s all he got. In America, production companies don’t even have to notify the IRS of winnings that low.

I understand this is a cable production, but there a couple of things that could be done to help throw a few more bucks the contestants’ way. As soon as the contestant surpasses his opponents’ score to win the game in the Match-Up, the game ends and a winner is declared. So if your opponent doesn’t do terribly well in the game and you just need one match to win, you could conceivably win with $150 or $200. Another idea is to do what America did for years. Make the Super Match worth $100/$150/$200 and play for “ten times that amount or…” when spinning the Star Wheel. For me, anyway, it just takes away from some of the fun when the contestant can hardly walk away with cost for a plane ride home even though he won the game.

Match Game isn’t going to light the word on fire, but it’s not doing anything to destroy the legacy either. It’s kinda just there. It’s an enjoyable half hour but I don’t know that if it were on in a similar timeslot in the States that I would work my life or TV schedule around watching it. Reader Ryan V. uploaded the premiere to YouTube and is visible here. For those of you in Canada, you can watch episodes officially at Comedy’s website. We’ve had some comments around the blog in the last day about it, but what did you think about it? If you haven’t yet, give it a watch and let us know below!

Author
Chad Mosher

About the Author

has written 124 articles on BuzzerBlog.

Visit this author's website   ·   View more posts by

Share This.
  • Subscribe to our feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

Discussion

32 responses to "Review: “Match Game” Canada Not a Home Run, Not a Strikeout"

  • SEAN says:

    Not bad, but not great eather. The host kind of reminds me of Al Debois of Bumper Stumpers with that accent. Although I do like the remake of the classic theme since it’s something you can rock out to. Compare this to the theme for MG98, wich was more tropical in nature not unlike The Pyramid on GSN.

  • Greg says:

    Not a homerun, not a strikeout. So what is it? A single? A double? An intentional walk? A HBP?

  • Ryan Mihalus says:

    I do agree and wich the player would win extra money in the Super Match, but, they do convert their score to dollars from the main game, so it isn’t a complete washout. This is a new TV game show for ‘english’ Canada. The French have always been high on game shows in Canada, but it has been a while since we saw a good Canadian show for those that are not fluent in french.

    It is a little rough around the edges, but overall, I thought it was good. The panelists do need to come together with chemistry a little more. having said that, watch early episodes Rayburn’s MG, they were not anything to arrange your schedule around either.

    As for dollar value, you have to get over it, it is what it is. The market is different and not the same. No winnings are going to be taxed, regardless of their amount.

    I think it may be a double, with a chance to steal third.

    -RTM

  • Nicholas Roche says:

    Any chance of a share for those of us NOT in Canada? The website isn’t allowing extra-Canadian viewers to see it.

  • Greg says:

    Yes folks, Canada is cheap. I like the music, though.

  • Greg P. says:

    (It seems there’s another Greg that posts to this blog)

    I thought it was misleading for Darrin (the host) to tell the contestant that he’d won $1,500 when he actually hadn’t won anything.

  • Scott says:

    I agree with everything you wrote there Chad, especially on the cheap part.

    Even other, less known, Canadian game shows give out more money than this version of Match Game does. Wipeout Canada gave out $50,000 per episode; same as the U.S. version does. Instant Cash and Ice Cold Cash gave away thousands per episode.

    And in Quebec, game shows like L’Oeuf Dor constantly give out hundreds of thousands of dollars in prize money.

    Yet Match Game gets stuck with a budget so low, it doesn’t make it worth being a contestant, because even if you win the game and get the top answer of the Super Match, if you don’t get a perfect match in the Star Wheel round, you’re walking away with only a few hundred bucks.

    • Jay Lewis says:

      You didn’t mention that…

      * Wipeout Canada was a 1 and done series filmed on that permanent set in Venezuela. It’s also very plausible that Tvtropolis would have more $$$ to throw around than Comedy.

      * Ice Cold Cash is also a one-and done show which never gave away thousands, as you say. You were lucky to win a few hundred on ICC. (Which was just awful to watch, btw).

      * La Poule (aED’O) is a lottery game show. All lottery shows are a different animal since the budget does NOT come from advertising.

      Personally, I would love to sit in a studio, play a fun parlor game and walk out with a couple-hundred bucks. All of the contestants were required to live in/near Montreal so I doubt anyone has travel costs.

  • Mr. Quiz says:

    Meh!

  • Sam says:

    I was eagerly anticipating this show, even set the pvr a week ahead to max sure i didn’t miss it. I think its a mess sadly. Hosting skills aren’t what they should be, but i’ll cut some slack as its a new host on a new show. The celebrity banter is annoying with C grade celebs trying to get their extra min or two or air time.The set is aweful with the stale looking Canadian “techno look” There was such potential, sadly falls short. Maybe i set my expectations too high. Gene’s show actually gave money away, with real stars for the most part that were recognizable.

  • Paco says:

    I like the show yes its not the Rayburn version or even the Shaffer version but its decent for a modern game show. I am glad the show didn’t relie on sex questions and answers. I gave up on our Family Feud because it got old hearing 2000000 different names for “Penis” This is a safe clean show.

    I like the set as well its a nice modern set. Retro sets get old after awhile i prefer a modern sets. I thought i was kinda weird that there wasn’t a host toaster podium with A or B. It always seem suspenseful when the host pulls out the little card and reads it. And that super match was played on a screen and the wheel was behind the contestant podium.

    The host is okay, I don’t know him he doesn’t really add much to the show. I kinda hope he has more enthusiasm later in the run. And he really needs to connect with the panel more i like when Rayburn and Shaffer walk to each panelist and kinda talks to them

    I prefer the Lilly Savage version for a English speaking revival

  • Philip says:

    I had high hopes for the show. I was not dissapointed, as I live in Montreal and I watch Atomes Crochus sometimes and I enjoy the interplay on that. I knew most of the names on this version except some of the lesser known Canadian comedians (knew Elvira and Jeremy, didn’t know Laura and Fraser) The money problem didn’t bother me too much, because it is Canada, and the amounts are lower. (Isn’t La Poule basically a lottery thing? People get on by getting a winning ticket? Government thing?)

    The weird thing is unlike the All new Pyramid and the old incantations of the Match Game, this version doesn’t go in order. Tuesday’s panel is different than Monday’s panel. This week there are 4 different groups of people. That would be my only quibble with the show. If you start with Yvette/Greg/Colin/Laura, make the whole week those panelists..

    All in all, I hope this show does well, like its french counterpart and hope that it at least comes back for a second series. I’d like to see who else they can get as panelists.

  • Josh says:

    Very pleased with the first show. The questions did not stray away from the original – we even had an Old Man Periwinkle question – and the set is nice. Darrin’s a bit stiff, but it’s very normal. The show was also rather rushed, but again, it’s first show jitters. After a while, this show will come into its own. And it’s a perfect network that airs it: Comedy. I have very high hopes for this show, and I don’t think it will falter.

    Also love the remix of the original theme! :)

  • Nicholas Roche says:

    Gameplay was pretty cool, considering it’s mostly a revamp of the US MG’90. Never really cared for the “MATCH-UP” round, although for this version, I guess it worked well.

    I’d still like to see a revival of the 70′s MG, with an appropriate boost in moneys, of course. A front game win gets $1000. Have the SUPER MATCH amounts be $1000-$500-$250, with the 10X for the Head-to-Head, and MAYBE bring the Star Wheel back, but instead of a flat DOUBLE, add the “mystery multiplier” used in the MG/HS HOUR–with 6 panelists, do 3 DOUBLES, 2 TRIPLES and one 5X for a possible top HTH jackpot of $50,000.

    • Nicholas Roche says:

      PS: Like the MG/HS HOUR, give the player a $1000 HTH base if they fail to get any of the AUDIENCE MATCH answers.

    • Josh says:

      Buddy, this is a cable network. I highly doubt they’d do that. I’d rather just see the original $500-$250-$100, with a 10X payoff (possibly 20X with a lucky spin on the Star Wheel) in the Head to Head. I think $10,000 is perfectly reasonable for a cable network.

      At least it’s good the player is given a $500 base if they fail to get an answer from the Super Match.

      I would much rather prefer that there be two Match Up rounds between each of the regular rounds. Seeing that this version is almost a carbon copy of MG90, I don’t see how they can’t insert a second Match Up.

  • Philip says:

    Also interesting to note is be sure to watch the current episodes 24 hours after broadcast as I was checking out Wednesday’s episode on the Comedy Network video player and noticed that they only leave the current episode on the player before dropping it. It does suck. I don’t get Comedy Network, but wanted to see at lest one episode of each group. I did see the first three episodes, but I feel bad that they aren’t leaving them up on the website for at least a few days.

    They must have some sort of agreement with the production company, as different shows stay on that VP for different amounts of time. (Conan for 1 week, Drawn Together for a long time) I thought with it being a Canadian production, it would stay there for a long time.

    As far as I know, only Episode 1 has been downloaded to Youtube

  • SlurpeeTigger says:

    Unfortunately, the TVs here in the hospital, werhe I am taking kemo, are now showing Comedy Netrowrk, so I just want to know, how many episodes will they air this season?

  • AndyAkeko says:

    “Not a home run, not a strikeout” is a perfect description. I was prepared for this show to be cover-your-eyes awful considering the Comedy Network’s previous game show attempt, “You Bet Your Ass.”

    But the panel may actually work. Of the two regulars, Debra DiGiovanni is a huge game show fan besides being Canada’s finest female comedian, and Sean Cullen is telegenic and certifiably insane. I was expecting he’d be writing 15-word esoteric answers but he’s actually done a decent job of matching with the contestants.

    Almost all the panelists are stand-up comedians or comic actors, which I guess you could expect from it airing on Canada’s comedy network. Besides Caroline Rhea or Colin Mocherie, foreign audiences likely have no idea who these panelists are. But based on some of the Canadian-centric questions and the bantering I’ve heard in the first week (like about the publishing schedule of the newspaper in Tillsonburg, Ontario) it’s pretty clear there’s no effort by the producers to air this show anywhere else anyway.

    I do hate the match-up round, since there’s no opportunity for comedy and just drags the whole show to a crawl while the contestants are basically flipping coins. I’m glad the super match has been left largely alone (with the expected cheap Canadian payoff, of course).

    • Dave says:

      I was always a fan of the Match Up round on MG90 and I’m glad to see it return. I’m Canadian and I’ve never heard of most of these celebrities so I can understand the limited appeal this version would have in the US.

  • Dave says:

    I agree with those who think the show is good but not great. The prizes are certainly cheap and chintzy but the game play is good, even if the ‘celebrities’ aren’t connecting with the players or each other. The thing that really bothers me though is the beginning of the show – the announcer awkwardly describes the show twice and says the show name twice but never introduces the host! Then, unlike his predecessors, Darrin doesn’t address the panel and let them drive the discussion; he makes an awkward joke and calls out a panelist and so far, that has yet to be funny.

  • Philip says:

    I was watching Tuesday’s episode which was the first one they showed with Tom Green and Amanda Tapping and I noticed that the female game player could have been on the panel. It was Jess Salomon, war crimes lawyer turned stand up comedian. I’ve heard her on the local Montreal radio station on certain shows including the Comedy show with future Match Game panellist Joey Elias. I know that she is very popular in Montreal and has done shows with some of the comedians who appear on the panel. I wonder if they deliberately placed her on that week’s episodes as they were probably people who she hadn’t worked with?

    I wonder if most of the contestants are from Montreal or did they advertise for comtestants from across Canada?

  • Rob says:

    Yeah, the prize money could be ramped up a bit to attract more attention and contestants. I like the panel and always enjoyed the original so it’s a cool way to kill a half hour. 2 negative comments (1 minor, 1 more annoying):

    - Quite a few typos/misspellings on the questions during the matching stage

    - The spinning wheel thing near the end doesn’t come to a smooth stop. It stops abruptly and even jerks backwards at times. Makes it look like it’s being controlled by someone backstage. Whether that’s true or not, fix that fast so there’s no reason to doubt integrity of game.

  • Dan says:

    this show is just boring…
    but the people looks like they’re having fun. it’s a game that’s fun to play but boring to watch.

  • Philip says:

    The first series finished last week. Has anyone heard how the ratings were or if there will be a 2nd season?

    i liked the show alot. It wasn’t amazing, but it was a great way to pass the time and, as a Montrealer, it was pretty interesting to see all the contestants. I knew a few of them personally, and many of them were in the arts or had blogs or were pretty well known. some of them could of been pannelists as well.

  • Alex says:

    The whole show is kind of like watching a game of heads or tails (those are literally the chances in the super match), it’s not very entertaining at all.

    I also find it completely useless to have them pick Question A or Question B. Neither choice has any effect on the question; they should just give out the question rather than AGAIN play heads or tails for something an outcome that has no relevance whatsoever.

  • doug says:

    this is the worst remake of a game show, they hold up their hands as if they are in school and at the end of show sean tries to dance to get attention worst show ever

  • Edwin says:

    There will be a season 2. They are looking for contestants. However, tapings will be in the Toronto area. Details are on the Comedy Network website.

Leave a Comment